The Fortifications Walk
The beginning of ‘The Fortifications Walk’ is the Place de la République, the centre of the town.
Directions to get there whether you come by car, bus or train are to be found on the ‘Introduction’ page on this website.
And, if you haven’t already done so, we recommend you read the ‘A Little History’ page on this website, before you go on the walk.
Latest Revision September 2024
‘Place défendue par Vauban, place impregnable, place attaquée par Vauban, place prise’
‘A town defended by Vauban is an impregnable town; a town attacked by Vauban is a conquered town’
(seventeenth century adage)
This Walk effectively comprises two halves, the first being the fortifications of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the second being the medieval fortifications. The walk proceeds in a clockwise manner which, after leaving the Place de la République, properly starts at the breach in the town wall at the top of the Rue de la Poterne and ends there too, before heading back to where it started in the place..
First, and because we start our walk with the seventeenth century fortifications, some information on Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633-1707), the man primarily responsible for the shape of all the town’s fortifications that we still see today.
The wars started in 1635 by France against Spain and only concluded in 1713 with the Treaty of Utrecht, resulted in the determination of Louis XIV to strengthen France’s borders and thereby better safeguard territory newly conquered under his policy of territorial acquisition. This determination may have been especially acute given that some of the territory gained in his campaign (and confirmed in the Treaty of Nijmegen 1678) had to subsequently be handed back in 1713.
Louis did not have to look far for the expertise he needed. France already had an illustrious line of military engineers with Jean Errard (1554-1610) who served Henry IV in the construction of fortifications in Picardie and the Ile-de-France. Antoine de Ville (1596-1656) continued where Errard left off (nearby Montreuil in the Pas-de-Calais region features his work). Blaise François Pagan (1607-1665) served in the army under Louis XIII and also wrote ‘Les Fortifications’ in 1628 which was to influence Vauban.
Under Louis XIV’s orders, the Comptroller General of Finance and Superintendent of Royal Buildings, Jean Baptiste Colbert (1619-1683), appointed a first ‘Commissioner General’ for fortifications. He was Louis Nicolas de Clerville (1610-1677) who distinguished himself during the 1664 expedition against Algiers as well as playing an important part in the construction of the Canal du Midi. Another of his responsibilities was the naval port of Rochefort.
One of his assistants in the latter two projects was Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban.
Born of minor nobility in the Morvan region, Vauban was in his early years already noted as being studious, especially in the sciences. Made an ingenieur ordinaire in 1655, he subsequently took part in a series of military campaigns under the command of Louis XIV which were highly successful. Vauban’s primary preoccupation was the unnecessary loss of life in battle and this spurred him to perfect the art of the siege as well as other military techniques, during these campaigns. He was instrumental in the rapid conquest of the south of Flanders (Lille, Douai, Orchies) as part of the War of Devolution in 1667, additionally taking Tournai in just one day. Apparently, the French conquest of Ath was achieved without any battle at all as on the approach of the French forces in June 1667, the Spanish garrison fled. But Ath was to become just one of the towns returned to the Spanish in 1678, not that this meant peace; just 19 years later, the French returned to capture it again.
Vauban had already been awarded the title of General Commissioner of Fortifications by Louis XIV in 1666, made formal on Clerville’s death in 1677. In the Nord region, Louis continued to see his north-eastern neighbours as potential invaders.
Vauban’s plan comprised the creation of the Pré Carré, effectively a double line of fortified sites running along the frontier with the (as it then was) Austrian Netherlands and beyond towards the Meuse at Givet and Charleville. Bergues was on the première ligne between Dunkirk and Lille (the line continuing eastwards to include Valenciennes and Maubeuge), with the deuxième ligne running from Gravelines on the North Sea coast via Saint-Omer, Aire-sur-la-Lys, Arras (and on via Douai, Cambrai and Avesnes). The concentration of defensive projects in this region, as compared to elsewhere, was almost certainly due to the relative lack of natural defences as well as the proximity of Paris to this north-east frontier.
Vauban was assiduous in his study of all types of fortification and he used precedent wherever he considered it appropriate. Vauban’s work at Bergues, with regard to all-new works, followed a simple model. This comprised a courtine (curtain wall - see the drawing below), a thick masonry-faced wall with a rubble and/or rammed earth mass behind, which helped absorb the impact from cannon balls. This defensive wall was the final defensive structure, always the strongest and the highest, a formidable barrier designed to be impregnable. Breaking the defensive wall’s length were bastions, four-sided structures providing flanking fire to additionally protect the defensive wall, as well as the flanks of adjoining bastions. Their position along the wall was determined by the need to avoid any ‘dead’ areas between bastions where musket and grapeshot could not reach.
Stretching between the bastions but located forward of the defensive wall, the tenaille (a thick wall usually lower in height than the main defensive wall) was provided as an additional obstacle to penetrate before being able to gain access to the main wall. The area between the defensive wall and the tenaille was deliberately narrow so as to reduce the number of men that could enter, as well as providing a canyon completely dominated from above by the defenders; in short, a lethal place for any attacker to find themselves.
But there was more. Forward of the main defensive wall (on the plan centreline of the tenaille) was a demi-lune (half-moon or the English ‘ravelin’) structure, not actually half-moon in plan but more usually triangular, which acted as a forward defence served by sunken or covered trenches leading out from behind the defensive wall. Finally, beyond the demi-lunes was the outer defensive line comprising the chemin couvert (covered way), a series of projecting triangles connected by a path which was protected by being located behind a dwarf wall. The path acted as location for forward cannon and musketry and was broken into smaller lengths by a traverse, a masonry or earth mound positioned at right-angles to the parapet line and acting as defensive positions, should the attackers gain access to the covered way. At the two ends of the demi-lunes were places d’arme rentrante and saillante (larger areas of the covered way where troops could gather for sallies, counterattacks, retreat etc).
Between the line of the defensive wall and bastions, and the demi-lunes and covered way, was a wide ditch, the fossé, completely overlooked on both sides, with a cunette (a small ditch or trench) running in the middle, filled with water. Beyond the covered way lay the glacis, a gentle slope down from the covered way to lower ground further out.
So, what did Vauban decide to do at Bergues?
His approach was entirely pragmatic, as indeed it was at nearly all the fortified sites that were his responsibility. First of all, Bergues already had a defensive wall dating from early medieval times which, in Vauban’s estimation, only required adjustment and/or repair together with some associated new works. Secondly, Bergues possessed an extensive network of canals and drainage channels, predominantly on the south and west sides of the town, dating from the earliest days of the County of Flanders and designed not only to permit the flooding of the platteland (flat land) in order to slow or even halt enemy progress, but also to prevent the water contained from being drained. Vauban’s experience in canal building aided his assessment of the use and modification of the existing waterways, for defensive purposes.
You are now on the north-west side of the ‘Couronne Saint-Winoc’ (Crown of Saint Winoc), so-called because if you look at the shape of the fortification on the plan it comprises a principal bastion in the middle (Bastion du Roi) and two semi-bastions each side (to the north, Demi-bastion Saint-Winoc and to the south, Demi-bastion Saint-Pierre), with defensive walls between, all located on the east side of the abbey grounds and together having the appearance on plan of a three-pronged crown. This is where the first of the new works under Vauban’s direction actually started in 1670 when Bergues became part of France at the time of the Treaty of Aachen in 1668. Given that the most likely threat to the town was from the east, it must have been decided to demolish the old town wall in this area (aside from consideration of its defensive capability, the old wall may well have been in very poor condition) in favour of this all-new work, rather than repair the old wall and repair the water defences.
At this point, with the main wall heading away to our right and the tenaille between the two bastions occupying the area, our path heads off slightly to the left as the ground ahead gently rises (while the path briefly descends) at the point where the caponniere appears, this being the path you will see heading back to the wall with a poterne (gate) giving access under the tenaille and through the courtine behind via a door. The ground was deliberately banked up on both sides of this path so as to afford some cover to the troops using it, as the path provided access to the redoubt futher south.
These bombproof shelters were built as protected spaces for the storage of supplies and/or shelter for troops and guns. The area has many other sally ports, tunnels and ‘secret passages’ permitting the garrison to move around without breaking cover in times of attack. In walking around this area, you will see several metal ventilation grilles set in the ground, providing air to these underground spaces and there are doors in walls in many locations in and around the couronne which exist either to facilitate defence or to confuse the enemy (some doors are ‘false’).
Assuming you continue on the sentier, walking on and heading west, you pass on the left a batardeau, dame et vanne, one of the sluices used to regulate the water level in the ditch, before arriving at the caponnière (cofferdam) that stretches across the ditch at right angles to the defensive wall and which acted as a barrier between flooded and dry areas.
It is difficult to determine if there is much left of anything original of this tower except its basic drum-like structure. It is similar to the Neckerstor which we’ll see a little later, in that it has two levels with the ground floor being vaulted; the stair to the upper level was on the north side.
The map made by Jacob van Deventer in 1550 shows the tower with a pepperpot roof but this disappeared with significant works carried out to a design of 1851 which resulted in a truncated roof finished with a triangular gable on the north side, in line with the town wall.
Upstairs, there were six cannon breeches arranged within the semi-circle that thus gave good cover all around the tower’s projecting wall; there was also a chimneypiece and a door giving access to the rampart path on the west side.
The area in front of the gate had a series of walls arranged as an ouvrage à cornes, in English ‘hornwork’, which was a forward defence structure comprising two walls extending out at right-angles to the gate with a wall linking them and a gate within. Vauban was always keen to provide a layered defence, the so-called ‘layers of the onion’, thereby imposing on any attacker the necessity to penetrate several defensive layers, each of which was capable of imposing crippling casualties as well as disorientating the enemy. These structures are still partially present, although the outer gate has long been a casualty of wars and the motor car.
Finally, the town council has treasured for some two years at least its proposal for providing a pedestrian footbridge here, as pedestrians are currently forced to dart through the gate via a very narrow strip of paving either side of the roadway inside which, given the high frequency of vehicle traffic, can be unnerving.
Permission to breach the town wall to provide a separate route for this footbridge has already been given and the rather charming sketch we see here illustrates, in principle at least, what is intended. In this writer’s opinion, simplicity and even anonymity would be conducive to success so as not to detract from the gate’s centuries-long pride of place.
From the sketch, one may discern that something akin to a simple beam bridge, supported at each end, is intended but given a gently sinuous configuration with - perhaps - timber decking and glass balustrading. While no detailed information appears to be available as yet (August 2021), this proposal looks promising in at least appearing to be modest. It will be very interesting to see the end result (works are due to start October 2021).
SEE NEWS 2023 BELOW!
The footbridge as envisaged.
The computer generated image for the new footbridge inevitably reduces the surroundings to what the programme can actually do graphically, in this case not much. This deficiency highlights the simple clean lines of the bridge but the complex reality of the setting thankfully easily assuages any thought of the bridge being too dominant and therefore intrusive rather than complimentary.
NEWS 2023
The footbridge as built.
Back in August 2021 as this website was being built, we commented (see above) on plans to introduce a pedestrian bridge alongside the Porte de Cassel, thereby relieving the dangers for pedestrians of having to pass through the gate with only a very narrow – indeed, near non-existent – path to follow. Of the still extant town gates, the Porte de Cassel is by far the most used to get into and out of the cour historique, especially by motor vehicles. It is estimated that some 6-7000 pass through the portal each day.
As part of what appears to be a concerted effort by the Mairie and Hauts-de-Flandre to spend money on improving a least some elements of the town (the others being improvements to the Place de la République and repairs to the Town Hall, which we cover briefly in ‘The Town Walk’), this project for the provision of the footbridge was initiated in 2023 and the design submitted to the French Ministry of Culture’s Monuments Historiques for approval, which was obtained within four weeks rather than the usual six. This was doubtless because the Porte itself suffered no alteration or loss at all and the new breach in the fortification wall itself, forming the access to the bridge, was in a part of the construction that was of much later date, and therefore less open to conjecture.
The end result is not exactly what appeared to be the case in the sketch (see above). What we see today is an arrow-straight bridge which spans the moat from a newly formed opening on the town wall to the bank opposite, landing on the east side of a mature willow tree. Just this consideration for the willow’s existence should be applauded as in lesser hands, thought might have been given to the tree’s removal in order to make the bridge not only a little shorter but also to look more logically arranged, in line with the Porte and parallel to it.
The fact that the distance between bridge and Porte grows as the bridge extends south works very well indeed as this not only helps preserve the Porte’s integrity but also enables us to see that the willow tree is an integral part of the design’s consideration. The arrangement of the bridge is also rather more dynamic than would have been the case, had it been positioned directly alongside the Porte.
If we walk down the Rue Maurice Cornette towards the Porte, there is at first little to advise you that you now do not need to worry about traversing the interior of the narrow gateway. This is because the new opening in the fortification wall is at right angles to the Porte entrance and it is only on approaching the Porte close up that one sees the new opening that gives access to the bridge. This is fine if you’re walking on the east footpath as you can’t miss the new way through; the new glass balustrade in front of the opening is also a visual cue. But walking on the west side means you only see your way through when you’re already almost at the Porte entrance, meaning you must cross the road here (or revert to the status quo ante i.e. walk through the gate). This effectively replicates something of the dangers to pedestrians of the previous through-the-gate-only access. This writer believes it would have been better to have a) installed a barrier, of the same type as the new one present on the east footpath by the new opening, to block access on the west footpath beyond the last house before the gate and b) to have provided a pedestrian crossing at that point to the other, east side of the street. Much safer all ‘round.
IWalking through the new opening brings with it a completely new vista when compared to the built-up Rue Maurice Cornette. We see the new bridge, certainly, but we also see to the left the view east to the Groenberg in the distance, the moat below us, the willow tree ahead and directly to our right, the solidity of the Porte’s east brick wall. This is all splendid.
The bridge itself is unashamedly modern. Nothing wrong with that, especially when in this case the design is modest, even straightforward and in being so does not try to compete with or emulate anything of the historic structure right beside it, which clearly deserves pride of place. The bridge is of a trapezoidal section comprising transverse steel plate ribs spot-welded to steel sheets, forming the underside, with a flat steel plate deck covered with a resin aggregate finish which has been used on the new footpath too. The bridge is therefore, effectively, one long very thin box section with all other structure – the little that there is - concealed within. Deck drainage appears to be via slots in the balustrade base, draining directly to the moat; those slots look likely to eventually block drainage rather than expedite it.
Monuments Historiques suggested the laminated glass balustrading to aid ‘transparency’, the glass panels being retained within a stainless-steel channel at deck level and ‘C’ section aluminium extrusions above that also act as a handrail (a hardwood handrail would have been a lot better, not only aesthetically but also more comfortable to grip). The transition from bridge to footpath at both ends is handled well with a stainless-steel threshold covering the gap and white cement has been used in forming the concrete retaining structures which enclose the neoprene pads and steel bases on which the bridge sits. The precast concrete edging to the footpath is of similar appearance. The colour chosen for the balustrading metalwork is perhaps a little too bright but for the partially-sighted it will be welcome. LED lighting is incorporated too.
On arriving at the opposite bank to the wall, the new footpath continues the straight trajectory of the bridge until it is past the lovely willow, at which point the path turns right and we pass the tree to end up at the footpath beside the road. On reaching this point, one unmistakably feels the satisfaction of having passed through something special, a spatial sequence that has delighted us. And you can do it all again, but this time heading back into town!
Just one more thing.
Those of you reading this that are British may well remember a little controversy erupting over a new bridge crossing the river Thames in London. Designed to be in place and open in the year 2000, the Millenium Bridge was billed as a ‘blade of light’ by its designers and certainly looked very different from other bridges in having its suspension system cables located under the deck. On the day it opened, the many walking across it were subjected to a swaying motion that caused them to feel vaguely amused, alarmed and/or seasick and resulted in closure the very same day. Some expensive alterations allowed the bridge to open again, some two years later. But the epithet ‘The Wobbly Bridge’ has endured.
Well, the Porte de Cassel pasarelle has a similar problem. But only if someone jogs across it. It seems that the regular pounding of someone’s feet as they run across the bridge produces much the same reaction as that of the London pasarelle, except the motion is not side-to-side but instead up-and-down. Thankfully, the scale of the London bridge is here in Bergues but a fraction of it and even then, the two designs are not the same at all. Nonetheless, interesting. It seems that while copious testing was carried out on the bridge’s capacity to support a given dead load, there was no testing in situ for any untoward effects from normal, daily use where dynamic loads would be applicable. The bridge is, after all, more than 27 metres in length and, as described, a very long steel sheet box section with minimal additional structure. With no intermediate support provided, some movement – or oscillation – could be expected under live load.
It’s not a big issue. Bergues can be proud of this new addition to its patrimony. And we can be sure that the involvement of Monuments Historiques in the design process has ensured that the built result is not just attractive in itself but also carefully considered with regard to context. This level of careful consideration is what Bergues should always get whenever new construction of any type is proposed to the cour historique.
You can walk along these remparts by passing through the Porte de Cassel and immediately on your left you’ll see a path which leads up to the track (and then the Chemin de la Neckerstor) that follows the line of the earthwork; or, at the track’s beginning, there is a small stair that gives access to the path on the rampart top. If you take either route, you’ll see the older of the two gunpowder stores that Bergues still has.
Our route, however, takes us through the little park on the left of the porte, which ends just before reaching the projecting Bastion du Moulin (Mill Bastion). At this point, you’re right beside the busy D 916, the main vehicle access route to Bergues, straightened and widened after the Second World War. This route permits us to see the defensive wall from the outside.
Continuing along the footpath beside the road, you will see the Gare de Bergues on your left. It is very much a building of its nineteenth-century time and the Region Nord in that it is of eclectic Neo-Gothic style, of red brick with lots of fussy (but good) brick detailing and gothicky windows. The platform canopy on the other side of the building still exists but the little waiting room on the Dunkirk platform has long vanished, replaced by one of those inimitably French 1920s concrete ‘bus shelter’ structures. Also missing, the adornments to the tops of the entrance bays on both sides and to north and south facades.
The coming of the railway in 1857 changed everything in the area, with the destruction of the demi-lunes that protected almost the entire length of the town wall on the west side. Further demolition took place after the last war with the arrival of the industrial park you see today, which took over railway land once occupied with a goods yard. All that remains now are isolated parts of the Couronne de Bierne and their associated flooded ditches which once acted as defence on this, the west side of the town but there is a pleasant walk from the back of the station towards neighbouring Bierne, which passes through and along the remnants of these structures.
The town council is considering a thorough reassessment of this area, given that it is right beside the principal access routes to Bergues (the railway, the bus station and the D 916) and thereby the introduction to the town for the majority of visitors – it is not a pretty sight. There is, as part of this reassessment, a clearly stated concern for the remains of Vauban’s work in this area, so it will be interesting to see what is eventually proposed. And, of course, what is eventually built.
Difficult to ignore is the Caserne de Bergues (Bergues Barracks) standing right behind the Porte de Bierne. This imposing building, of typical eighteenth-century Classical design, examples of which are to be found all over France, was first named Quartier Bierne but then assumed the name Caserne Thémines after the Maréchal of same name (Pons de Lauzières-Thémines, a soldier of the French army under Louis XIII, who found favour in assisting Louis in repressing Italian rebellion against French rule). The name changed again to Caserne Leclaire in recognition of Théodore François Joseph Leclaire (1752-1811), Brigadier General who, as part of the Flanders Campaign in the Revolutionary Wars, distinguished himself in August 1793 in defeating the Duke of York’s Anglo-Hanoverian Corps at nearby Wormhout and Esquelbecq. Leclaire pushed them north, thereby liberating Bergues as well and in September the same year, further distinguished himself in the Battle of Hondschoote which forced a further British retreat to Veurne. The building served as a military hospital during the Revolution.
Beside the west façade of the caserne, you’ll see a yard (the former cour des accessoires to the caserne) with garages, through which you should walk and on reaching the Rue de l’Arsenal, over the road you’ll see a path to the left beside a low brick wall, next to the bridge – this path follows the ramparts and ends at the Porte de Dunkerque.
Cross over the sluice and at the porte, turn left and walk through to the other side – there is a pleasant green space nearby with willow trees, a good spot to look at the gate.
Passing back through the porte, we continue to La Taverne Vauban on the corner, at the beginning of the Rue du Quai on the left with its gateway leading into the port of Bergues.
The Rue du Quai originally had the Flemish name Kaaystraete and before that, the Noord Mullenstraete due to the wheat mill that once stood near La Tour Rouge (the mill is long gone but we’ll see the tour a little later).
The port is simply a wider part at the west end of the Canal de la Basse Colme, here at its junction with the Canal de la Haute Colme (heading west) and the much wider Canal de Bergues (heading north to Dunkirk). The Canal de Bergues is still navigable today, but the Canal Basse and Haute Colme fell out of use in the 1960s and are now déclassé (unnavigable).
From the gate, we can pass through it and take:
a) the path along the remparts (you’ll see the path on the left, heading upwards) heading east or
b) take the rustic Chemin de Guy de Dampierre which takes you through the Presqu’Ile area discussed as part of ‘The Town Walk’ or
c) walk the ‘urban route’ down the Rue du Quai to the Pont de Saint-Jean and turn left to pass through the Place du Marché aux Fromages
You’ll see a gravel path heading off alongside the town wall, which passes through a pleasant tree-lined area and brings us to the last point of interest, the Tour des Sept Baraques (which means ‘Tower of the Seven Tombs’?).
This tower is different in being rectangular in plan with a stone base and its brick walls are battered. The extent of the building once clearly exceeded what we see today, judging from the stone remains in front and alongside the cofferdam which tend to suggest something like the Porte de Bierne may once have stood here. The building looks to have been altered as well by the defensive wall itself, on the east side, of Vauban’s date.
The tower acted as a postern gate, giving access from the defensive wall to the ditch and the cofferdam. There is a cannon porthole low down on the west side, acting as flanking cover here, partially hidden behind the massive corner pier. The doorway you see is modern.
As a footnote to what we have seen on The Fortifications Walk, back in 1922 there were plans proposed by the French authorities to radically alter Bergues’s fortifications, the idea being, I would guess, to make them better resistant to the modern methods of warfare encountered during the First World War. Apparently, a concerned group of Berguois, keen to preserve unaltered what they perceived as an essential part of the town’s history, protested at the plans. Luckily, it seems both the Ministries of Defence and of Culture were unable to agree a way forward and in 1936, the entire extent of the fortifications was declared a Monument Historique.
Progress is inevitable and the changes that come with it. But we have those brave and concerned citizens to thank for the fact that the fortifications, in all their splendour, are still present today for us and future generations to enjoy and admire.
And on that note, in the Spring of 2024 the Mairie held a public consultation to ascertain what its citizens considered to be priorities for the town to act on. Number 1 was revealed to be the maintenance and repair of les remparts! No-one should be surprised by this because, if you’ve just completed the walk described on this page, you’ll have seen how nature has effectively overrun the structure in many places, but especially on the east side. Ivy in particular but also many other plants have taken hold and are slowly weakening, via their root networks, the glue that holds the brickwork together, namely the mortar. With the mortar pointing weakened, rainwater is better able to penetrate the structure’s fabric and with alternate freeze-and-thaw cycles in the colder months, the brickwork is dislodged and falls away.
There has been at least some attempt to arrest decay. In recent times, local shepherds have been licensed to permit their flocks to graze the approximately 40 hectares of green space that abut the fortifications, a policy which has helped control ground cover. There is also an arrangement with Hauts de France whereby emergency repairs are carried out to the walls themselves. But this is not even a holding operation and the town knows it. It’s estimated that it would cost some 20 million euros to repair and restore the entire wall so as to safeguard it for the future. Unsurprisingly, this is money the town does not have.
Enter the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations. This extraordinary body, created in 1816 as a successor to a similar organisation created by Napoleon, can best be described as a ‘vehicle of convenience’ for the funding of investment by the French State. It is controlled by parliament and defined as ‘a public group serving the public interest’. It is also a long-term investor and has stakes in many French companies such as La Poste, Transdev, RTE….the list goes on. In 2008, the CDC sponsored a new ‘compensation fund for biodiversity’ via its specialised subsidiary CDC Biodiversité. After discussion with the Agence d’Urbanisme et de Developpement de la Region Flandre Dunkerque (a planning and development agency for the region) following the result of the public consultation, the CDC Biodiversité was named as a possible source of assistance. It has a mandate to assist in achieving the government’s aim of carbon neutrality by 2050, so it is interested to support initiatives that involve not just the conservation of existing natural resources but also their enhancement. The 40 hectares of green space in which Bergues’s fortifications find themselves look to be a prime candidate for the CDC’s attention and, hopefully, financial beneficence, allied to new industrial developments planned for the Dunkirk area where losses to biodiversity in those locations could be made up for by enhancing Bergues’s green spaces. That could mean a saving for the Bergues’ municipality i.e. instead of spending its money on looking after those green spaces, that money could now be reallocated to looking after the fortifications themselves.
This could release something in the order of 200,000 euros of the municipalitiy’s funds per year. It’s nowhere near the 2 million euros required for les remparts in their entirety, but it would allow the town to pursue a steady year-by-year programme of much needed repair and maintenance.
It is extraordinary, even slightly bewildering, to imagine what the fortifications could look like in, say, ten years’ time should this initiative bear fruit….
We very much hope you’ve enjoyed ‘The Fortifications Walk’! If you haven’t also been on ‘The Town Walk’, may we recommend that you do so after, of course, rest, relaxation and refreshment in the Place de la République!